№

Assessment Criteria

Description

Scoring Rubric

1

Relevance of the Topic

Addresses a pressing issue relevant to society or the field

0 – Irrelevant

1 – Somewhat

2 – Moderate

3 – Relatively relevant

4 – Relevant

5 – Extremely Relevant

2

Innovation

Whether it presents a new idea, methodology, or perspective

0 – Does not exist

1 – Very few

2 – Common

3 – In some aspects, innovative

4 – Innovative

5 – Highly innovative

3

Content structure

Clear introduction, methodology, results, and conclusion

0 – Violation of rules

1 – Mostly incomplete

2 – Mixed structure

3 – Structured but unclear

4 – Clearly structured

5 – Excellent and logical structure

4

Scientific basis

Theory and methodology comply with research requirements

0 – Unscientific

1 – Weakly founded

2 – Partially founded

3 – Sufficient

4 – Reliable

5 – Advanced level

5

Accuracy of results

The actual results and conclusions are well-founded

0 – Incorrect or insufficient

1 – Vague

2 – Relatively clear

3 – Clear

4 – Fully accurate

5 – Evidence-based and reliable

6

Conciseness and clarity of the abstract

Concise, clear, and free of unnecessary words

0 – Vague 

1 – Excessively long

2 – Slightly unclear

3 – Brief but unorganized

4 – Brief and clear

5 – Very well summarized

7

Practical applicability

Applicability in the pharmaceutical field

0 – Not applicable

1 – Very low

2 – Applicable but uncertain

3 – In some cases

4 – Applicable

5 – Can be directly applied

8

Utilization of sources

Correctly formatted citations and sources

0 – Not present

1 – Incorrectly cited

2 – Limited

3 – Sufficient

4 – Properly cited

5 – Fully compliant with scientific standards

9

Language, style, and grammar

Spelling accuracy and academic style

0 – Contains numerous errors

1 – Unclear

2 – Incorrect

3 – Moderate

4 – Sufficient

5 – Adequately good